WALL·E (2008)

A small trash-compacting robot on an empty Earth. Pixar's most courageous opening act and one of the great love stories of 21st-century animation.

At a glance

  • Director: Andrew Stanton
  • Runtime: 98 minutes
  • Rating: G
  • Release date: 2008-06-27
  • Genre: Animation
  • Our score: 8.4/10

Themes

Synopsis

Seven hundred years from now, Earth has been abandoned. WALL·E — Waste Allocation Load Lifter, Earth-Class — is the last of his line, a small box-bodied robot who has spent centuries alone compacting humanity's garbage into towers taller than skyscrapers. He has developed a personality. He collects objects. He plays a worn-out Betamax of Hello, Dolly!.

A sleek white probe named EVE lands. WALL·E falls in love. EVE finds a living plant, returns to her ship, and WALL·E follows — into space, onto the Axiom, the luxury cruise liner where the surviving humans have been drifting in obesity and comfort for centuries. The film becomes a different film in its second half. It is still, at its centre, about two robots and a plant.

Our review

The bravest opening forty minutes in mainstream animation

WALL·E's first act has almost no dialogue. Just a small robot on an abandoned Earth, going about his routine, returning at sunset to a storage container he has decorated. The sound design is Ben Burtt — the man who designed R2-D2's voice and the lightsaber hum — and what he gives WALL·E is a vocabulary of beeps, mechanical sighs, and the small rattles of a body that's been working too long.

Pixar pitched a near-silent feature to Disney and Disney let them make it. It is hard to overstate how unusual that decision was. Pixar built credit during the 1995–2007 run that allowed Andrew Stanton this swing, and the swing connects: the opening sequence is arguably the most emotionally complete short film embedded in a feature in the studio's history.

The second-half problem and why it doesn't actually break the film

When the action moves to the Axiom, the film changes tone. It becomes broader, more conventionally plotted, with humans who are physically depicted as overweight and dependent on motorised chairs. Some readings — at the time and since — have found the satire of these humans uncomfortably close to fat-shaming.

The more generous reading, and the one Stanton has consistently offered, is that the humans on the Axiom aren't being mocked for their bodies; they're being depicted as people who haven't been allowed to move, look up, or talk to each other in five centuries because a corporation organised their lives for profit. The film's villain, Auto, is an automated autopilot serving a 700-year-old corporate directive. WALL·E is not satirising obese people; it's satirising a system that produces them.

Romance as worldbuilding

WALL·E and EVE communicate through trills, gestures, and a held hand. Their love story is built almost entirely from animation — body language, lens flares, the way EVE waits for WALL·E to catch up. It is one of the few mainstream films in which the central romance is between characters who cannot say 'I love you' and don't need to.

Pixar's animators studied silent-era performers — particularly Buster Keaton and Charlie Chaplin — for the visual storytelling. The influence is direct and visible.

Why it's worth watching

  • It's the most ambitious thing Pixar has ever attempted and one of its most emotionally precise.
  • The first forty minutes are a near-silent masterclass.
  • Ben Burtt's sound design is a Hall of Fame entry.
  • Thomas Newman's score earned the film one of its six Oscar nominations.

Principal cast

  • Ben Burtt as WALL·E / M-O (voice)
  • Elissa Knight as EVE (voice)
  • Jeff Garlin as Captain B. McCrea (voice)
  • Fred Willard as Shelby Forthright (live action)
  • Sigourney Weaver as Axiom Computer (voice)

Did you know?

  • Andrew Stanton developed the concept at a 1994 Pixar lunch where the original team also outlined Toy Story, A Bug's Life, and Monsters Inc.
  • Fred Willard is the only live-action character in the film. He plays the BnL CEO whose archival footage explains the back-story.
  • Roger Ebert called it 'an enthralling animated film, a visual wonderment and a decent science-fiction story.'

If you liked this, try